soybean field trial

Share This Article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

The Value of Field Trials

lia marchi werle headshot
Lia Marchi Werle
Field Development Manager

Like new cars are taken out for test drives before purchase, new adjuvant products go through field studies to see how they perform in a realistic environment before they are finalized. Once extensive efforts towards the development of a new product are finalized, it is time to take it for a “spin.” Field studies are a way to bridge theory and cropping systems. 

Field studies are not limited to academic institutions only. Agricultural holdings and farmsteads utilize them to test new concepts. At Exacto, we use these studies to test the performance of newly developed formulations in food and ornamental crops. It all starts with a hypothesis, in other words, a question that can be answered simply and effectively. For example, we may want to understand how an oil-based adjuvant tank mixed with glufosinate will impact the control of giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida). Understanding these critical factors of field study design can help end-users realize the value of this type of research:  

          • Field History
          • Study Layout
          • Border Rows
          • Trial Management
          • Results and Analysis

Field history

Understanding the field’s history is the first and foremost important factor when designing a field study. Once a study objective has been determined, choosing a location that limits variability such as soil texture, fertility, or pest pressure, is essential to eliminate data bias. For example, giant ragweed (picture 1) has a strong dominance over parts of Exacto’s local site. Therefore, the strategy is to use post-emergence herbicide and adjuvant trials to effectively manage broad leaf weeds. In comparison, studies focused on grassy weeds may be perfectly placed in areas where giant ragweed has not established itself. When possible, place studies in the locations that equally account for the variability within each strip. Also, if crop yield is a critical assessment of the study, avoid areas of known high or low productivity to reduce bias in a treatment.

Picture 1: Abdullah Albasri, Exacto Research Specialist in a highly infested giant ragweed area in our Sharon research field.

Study Layout

Upon location determination, decide each strip’s dimensions (plot or replication of each treatment within the field). The measurements for each strip must match throughout the study so that evaluations are done fairly (picture 2). Overall, a wellreplicated study will have 3-4 replications that are randomized within the study area. Replications help to reduce data bias due to the lack of homogeneity. 

Picture 2: Adjuvant study layout with treatments randomized within the area. Each flag indicates the location of the two center rows, where treatment assessment occurs. 

Its challenging to identify a field location without variability (picture 3). While it may be a result of mother nature, researchers must be prepared for the challenges imposed on the study to minimize data skewness. Lastly, a control treatment must be included to compare the other treatments. Control treatments provide a baseline and are commonly defined as the standard practice utilized in a growers field. In our case, the controls are typically sprayed without an adjuvant in the tank mixA key component of herbicide-adjuvant studies is the rate as to which the active ingredient is used. While growers must always use herbicide labels to determine how much product to put in the sprayers, researchers need to consider a lower rate. A good rule of thumb is half of the amount recommended by the label. By doing so, weed control will be less effective which allows for adjuvants to show off whether they made a difference in weed control. 

Picture 3: The research plot in Sharon, WI, shows uneven weed pressure. 

Border rows

Planting border rows (picture 4) between treatments minimizes the confounding effects of an adjacent treatment. Border rows should be considered any time an application is presumably going to impact crop growth or health. For example, border rows are highly important for field studies involving pesticide application technology where the off-target movement (drift) generated by foliar applications is tested. While it increases the area necessary to conduct a study, border rows are a convenient and easy method to minimize the confounding influence of a neighboring treatment. For example, we commonly use a 4-row treatment strip for the test applications, but only evaluate the middle two rows to avoid border effects. 

Picture 4: Young corn field (~20 days after emergence) highly infested with foxtail. The wooden stake indicates the two center rows of a treatment area, where evaluations will occur. One row on each side of the center rows is the designated border row. 

Trial Management

Careful and consistent management practices are pivotal in a successful field study. Holding variables constant, except for the variable of interest, will allow for direct result comparisons among treatments. In that way, you can compare apples to apples” since the only factor changing in the study is the factor being tested. Any circumstances that change over time will cause difficulties in interpreting the results. 

Observations and data recording

Another key component of a field study is a clear schedule and method for collecting data. Researchers record observations throughout the growing season to fully understand the story being told. In herbicide-adjuvant studies, the two weeks that follow application are paramount to draw conclusions. Treatment efficacy is the most crucial factor in herbicide-adjuvant research. Therefore, a visual assessment of the control percentage inflicted by the treatment is recorded relative to an untreated weed on a pre-planned schedule. Due to the subjectiveness of the damage scale, it’s recommended that evaluations are done by a single individual using an untreated weed as a reference. Careful assessments of weed species present in each plot are then recorded along with any other relevant observations about the study performance. Collecting images is also helpful for assessment verification, drawing conclusions, and accounting for variability within the study. 

Picture 5: One plot within a soybean study. The dying weeds within the two center rows were the subject of a herbicide-adjuvant study, where weed damage was visually evaluated on a scale of 0-100 % control. 

Result analysis

Conducting the study is only half of the battle. It is equally important to apply the correct method to analyze the data and carefully interpret the results. Given that at least three replications are present, statistics can be used to determine if variations are attributed to the treatment or factors not controlled by the study. Statistics enable a strict process to compare treatment results. The term p-value is common terminology used at the benchmarks of 0.05 or 0.10 (5 or 10% of significance level). For example, if a study uses the p-value of 0.05, we are 95% confident that the differences observed in the study originated from the treatments. Least Square Differences (LSD) are also frequently used to explain field data to determine the smallest difference allowable between two treatments to detect significant differences. Even if treatments are not statistically different, the data is still valuable as it explains that treatments did not result in changes and additional strategies need to be considered. Simply knowing this is beneficial to understand more about the conditions and performance of a given field and aids future management decisions. No difference is just as valuable as a measurable difference in herbicide adjuvant performance. 

Benefits

A field study results in an understanding of the role the adjuvant can play with active ingredients within different environmental conditions. Adjuvants are not created equally and understanding their performance is key for optimizing pesticide applications. Field studies highlight the differences between the various adjuvant products on the market and supports the decision-making process for our end users: growers. A well-designed and executed field study creates trust in products and shows the added value they deliver. With increasing weed resistance and the lack of novel active ingredients in the market, optimizing the effectiveness of existing pesticides is becoming even more critical. Adjuvants can help to enhance the effectiveness of main active ingredients, reducing weed survival, and therefore limiting herbicide-resistant development.  

Exacto Heads to Capitol Hill

Leaders from Exacto and other companies recently took part in advocacy activities in Washington, DC, engaging in twenty-four meetings with congressional leadership, senators, and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). They addressed a major challenge related to the Endangered Species Act (ESA).

Read More »

Adjuvants for Enlist One® and Enlist Duo®

With tightening EPA regulations and increased label restrictions on dicamba, Corteva’s Enlist One® and Enlist Duo® are seeing increased adoption. As more growers make the change, choosing the right adjuvants to use with Enlist One and Enlist Duo is key to ensuring optimum weed control.

turf research highlight field day athletic field mulched leaves

Research Highlight: Athletic Fields & Leaf Mulching

Explore UW-Madison’s turf research studies from the Wisconsin Turfgrass Association Field Day. Dr. Soldat’s Soil Science Program showcased an athletic field management study comparing conventional & organic approaches. Dr. Koch’s Plant Pathology Program highlighted a leaf mulching study.

Mid-Season US Crop Update

With a dry spring hanging over the corn belt, concerns of returned crop stress remain going into the second half of the season. Regional drought monitor maps give reason for this concern as drought lingers in across much of the central US.

turf plot impacted by localized dry spot, hydrophobic areas

Improving Soil Moisture with Turf Wetting Agents

Turf needs water to survive. If not managed effectively, soil moisture can cause consistent problems such as water-repellancy that create dry patches, inconsistent turf appearance, and in severe cases, complete loss of turf. Turf wetting agents help move water into the soil, improve uniformity, and increase moisture retention.

Strengthening Soil Water Management With Agricultural Wetting Agents

Soil water management plays a big role in both agriculture and turf industries, but turf holds secrets to advancements in moisture management technology that haven’t reached agriculture yet. Agricultural wetting agents are here and ready to help farmers manage water and keep moisture in the soil.

Adjuvants Improve Fungicide Applications in Turf

As the heat of summer nears, so does the threat of fungal diseases infecting turf. Planning a fungicide application with adjuvants based on environmental conditions and the turf ecosystem can improve fungicide effectiveness.

fungicide application soybeans corn fungal pathogen disease

How Fungicides & Adjuvants Work Together to Reduce Disease Pressure

Fungicides are an important part of plant health, protecting crops from disease. Corn tar spot, southern corn rust, and frogeye leaf spot are a few diseases that can be costly if not treated with an effective fungicide application. Planning an application with adjuvants specifically targeting these diseases is imperative to reducing disease pressure.

turf field trials

Turf Field Testing – Where Great Ideas Become Great Products

How do great ideas turn into high-quality products? The idea is translated into a stable, quality formulation then the questions begin. At what rate should the product be applied? When should it be reapplied? Can it be mixed with other materials? Does it need to be watered-in? We answer these questions by conducting field trials to put new product ideas to the test under real-world conditions.

weed needed high quality surfactant corn field

Is This Surfactant Too Good to be True? Here’s How You Can Test It

Adjuvant decisions may not seem like a big deal, but they can make a real difference in active performance, agronomic effects, and overall cost of an application. It’s important to ask questions to understand product composition and potential agronomic effects to determine if an adjuvant will truly be cost effective.

potting soil wetting agents

Why Wetting Agents Are an Asset for Potted Plants

Have you ever purchased a potted plant and noticed that after a few rounds of watering it, the water was going straight down to the drainage holes? This classic case of water repellency or hydrophobicity in the soil can be resolved with the use of soil surfactants, or wetting agents.

spring 2023 crop update

US Crop Update – Spring Planting Outlook

With ongoing drought in the southern plains and increased snow cover in the the north and west, the US is split between dry and wet conditions this spring. As rain and snow cover relieve California and surrounding states, the extra water is causing concern for dam pressure and flooding.

Follow Exacto, Inc.

Featured Product